navigation Home Portfolio Services Rates Contact

Posts tagged ‘politics’

July 20th, 2010

Political News Sites

Politico

One of the most important aspects of a web site is what people first see on the initial page. In this case, it is primarily advertisement areas with some disturbing balding heads. While the ad areas are better designed than most I have seen, it is important to note that people come to a site for its content. Forcing people to scroll down significantly to view the news is not a good idea.

The navigation on the site is very well done— it is bright and obvious with a large font that contrasts well, and the names of sections are clear.

Important interactive elements, such as the poll, are all shoved down to the very bottom of the page. Most first-time visitors will not bother to scroll that far.

Elements that were well done include the news headlines and excerpts. They are a good readable size, with the authors visible and enough excerpt to entice without cluttering. The headlines were fairly well written— short and effective. There is a decent sense of white space— on content heavy sites it has to be used sparingly, but should not be tossed out altogether. The accent colours were used well— just enough to emphasize important points without becoming overwhelming or vulgar.

Daily Political

This shows how a strong contrasting background helps a heavy content site pop for its readers. When the background is also a light colour, it all blends together confusing the eye. The rich blue helps this site appear as a concise block and draws the eye right to the text.

The same cannot be said of the navigation— it blends right into the background and looks identical to the main font of the web site. Look over the Politico navigation and see how it comes right to the forefront, unlike this site.

Daily Political does have a better use of the initial page— most important information is right there, and the photos aren’t cut off at strange angles. It could learn something from Politico in its use of spot colour for the news headlines.

While thumbnail spot photos are interesting, they are not the most effective means of visual communication. They are too small to make an impact, and a large number of them seems like a patchwork quilt. It is better to use larger and fewer images.

CA Political News

This site has a more interesting visual masthead than most news web sites, which quickly drew my eye. The navigation was obvious and well structured, although a trifle small.

Notice that the text is all jammed up against the side— never do this. It is far better to have a narrow, newspaper style column than text running up against its boundaries. Notice also that the hierarchy is confused— it is not clear where to look first or what is most important. When having to read long articles, it is crucial to have a relaxing environment in which to read them.

The Washington Times

Notice that while many items are “below the fold” on the homepage, the site keeps two columns filled with the most relevant information right up front. “Happening Now” is in the prime location— top left. The list of latest editorials is also in an obvious location.

On this particular site, instead of a slideshow of images, the headline story has its own hero shot and featured homepage slot. This is an interesting idea— although I would recommend less height on the hero so that people do not have to scroll in order to view the headline.

The top navigation, while a readable size, has insufficient contrast. The grey under “News” is too close to the grey of the link colour. Main navigation needs to be of the sort that a quick glance tells the visitor all they need to know.

The Huffington Post

By site stats, this is probably one of the most popular political news sites online. Notice that its navigation is clean and makes quick sense, with the main headline blatantly huge. Its columns are well organized with a variety of image sizes, although the subheads could stand being slightly larger. They repeat the navigation at the bottom of the page, which is helpful after having scrolled past all the news stories. The site has a strong connection with social media and duplicates references to it on each part of the page.

Salon.Com

This is a good example of how a strong masthead can help even a bit of a mess down below appear to hang together. The site is well anchored in the bold red and black of the top navigation area, which is a similar method to having a dark overall background.

I have noticed many news sites attempt to replicate a newspaper look. This makes some logical sense, but there are many better ways to use online features. Imagine this page with coloured headlines— it would be so much easier to do a quick scan of the main news items and choose one to click on.

If you go to the bottom of their homepage, they have a very well designed “Other News” area with tasteful columns and logos. This is an excellent look to use— very elegant and airy.

Talking Points Memo

So far this is one of the best sites available for hierarchy. Your eye goes straight from the logo to the main headline, taking a quick pause on the ad banners. Subtitles are still obvious, but not vying with the headline, and subtle accent colour is used where necessary. Links are obvious and the photos quite attractive.

I particularly liked their “Follow Us” on the subpages:

Large and clear with the main three quick and easy to access. While their homepage could still use some improvement, I believe their individual article pages were the best I’ve seen on a political site, other than their lack of commenting ability.

AlterNet

I liked the idea of a coloured bar breaking into the background to display the navigation— they also have a very large font size for the nav as well, which is admirable.

Their use of a horizontal display of news items with thumbnail images is excellent. It is able to give several news stories prime real estate with no scrolling and without having to go through a slide show. The various columns are different enough that they read as clearly unique areas, rather than a mass of tangled information. It begins to lose that sense the lower down the page it goes.

The bottom area is particularly well put together with the various categories spelled out. It is an intriguing idea to use different colours in areas to obviously show where one is on the site. I’ve used it a few times, and in a news arena it might be quite effective. Used poorly, multiple colours can also entirely sink a web site, particularly if all used on the homepage.

Tech Learned:
- Always have commenting available, this is universal and put to use
- Include Facebook & Twitter repost ability on news posts

Design Learned:
- Be careful what is visible ‘above the fold’ on a web site
- Reduce scrolling to find interactive elements
- Use accent colours carefully
- Always keep some white space, even on text heavy sites
- Newspapers aren’t always right– colours are allowed!

May 18th, 2010

Political Candidates

This time of year, many people go out onto the internet in order to decide who to vote for. There isn’t much that can be fit into little mailings, and the voter guide is often incomplete. This means the only other options are to phone/email the campaign headquarters or visit their website. Most people don’t want to bother phoning or emailing, and prefer going to the site to look up what they want to know. So what is it they want to know?

A poll revealed:
1 – Voting/Ruling History (Are they all talk? What actions and hard data is there on their past?)
2 – Endorsements/Donors (Who is supporting them?)

What people were not interested in:
Family life (Who their spouse is, where they grew up)
Baseless promises (Talking about what they plan on doing, rather than what they’ve done)

As an example, let me take the candidates for judge in Sonoma County, CA. The residents of the county I talked with said that they found choosing a judge was the most difficult of the categories since there was so little information out there. The internet is what they had to 100% rely on.

John LemMon

Notice the first thing that hits you is a massive block of mostly small text? Most visitors would really have to want to be there to stay. Huge blocks of text that keeps on scrolling and scrolling is a quick way to send people screaming to a different web site. it also has a lot of different colours all vying for attention– particularly in the large rotating photographs. A simple change to have those be in black and white would make a significant positive impact on the design.

In the hierarchy, the rotating photos first grab a visitor’s attention. It was a negative impact in my particular case. I am quite familiar with the differences between Jail and Prison. I know the average person thinks they are the same, but that is not so. Jail is where anyone could end up– innocent or guilty. You could end up there just by accidentally being in the wrong place at the wrong time. It is a sort of holding area. Prison is where the criminals go after sentencing. Building the main message of a web site on sending horrible criminals to Jail, therefore, is fundamentally flawed and confusing. It would have been a simple matter of changing the text that rapists should “Go to Jail!” to rapists should “Go to Prison!” and makes one question the qualification of the candidate for judge if he doesn’t even know something basic like that.

Second on the hierarchy are paragraphs explaining the candidate’s growing up years, and plans for the future. This is exactly what most people don’t want to know. After a quick glance at the navigation, none of them included past history or actions. His endorsement list was tiny and didn’t include much good information. In short, he had no information that was helpful to decide whether or not to vote for him, and huge amounts of useless information that people don’t care about. After carefully reading the entire site, a visitor still wouldn’t know whether or not to vote for him.

Pat Broderick

Although the design is clearly amateur, at least it has a somewhat clear colour scheme and sticks to it for the most part. The navigation is obvious and large enough for the elderly to click on without trouble. The list of his past positions is impressive, but there aren’t any specific case examples. “Presided over thousands of criminal misdemeanor matters” would it hurt to give case studies of a few of them? That is what people want to know, and do not enjoy having to waste hours trying to find out.

The endorsements were very helpful, because they included some key political figures and their positions. The fact he is endorsed by Mayor Pam Torliatt and Supervisor Efren Carrillo show that he is probably a liberal. Of course we’d know for certain if a list of past decisions and rulings were on the web site. So in the end, a tiny bit of information was gathered from the site, but still left a huge number of questions unanswered.

Chris Mazzia

He has one of the most beautiful clean web sites of all the candidates. It has a light airy feel that encourages closer perusal. The white space use is excellent without being overpowering and the main sidebar navigation is nice and large. Unfortunately, the main navigation is tiny and gets lost– it is a small light grey and doesn’t look much like navigation. The endorsements page is well done, but the rest is still “all talk” as it were. While as a web site (other than the navigation) it is extremely good, it still fails as a voter information site.

Jamie Ellen Thistlethwaite

Her colour scheme is carefully put together to induce an emotional state of calm stability. Someone knew what they were doing when they designed the site– while it isn’t impressive as a layout, the colours are very well chosen and effective. It is also simple and clear with its information, and the obvious social media list shows she is up-to-date with modern society. Her Twitter account is active and used properly. Often candidates don’t have one at all, or the use it incorrectly as just a place to list events. She interacts with those who tweet her and responds to them, showing a candidate who cares about the electorate. She is one of the few candidates who has a lot of endorsement quotes, rather than just names. The endorsement list itself is impressive, and includes photographs to break it up.

Unfortunately, all she lists is her platform, rather than past tactile actions. It is intriguing that pretty much all the voters want to know hard facts, rather than general promises, and yet all the candidate sites ignore that. You can pretty much put up the list of what real people want to know and find it is the opposite of what candidate web sites offer.

Without ending on a negative note, however, the fact they have a web site at all is very helpful in itself. Many candidates had no web site, so they wouldn’t even be considered by the vast number of younger people in the population. If you are going to all the sites to choose which judge to vote for, and discovered several of them had no site, that pretty much instantly eliminates them from the list automatically.

Even a poorly done site, like some of the ones above, gives an edge above candidates who have no web site at all.